Cannabis is to be reclassified as a class B drug, Jacqui Smith has said.
Because, presumably, there is a good reason to do so:
The home secretary said she wanted to reverse Tony Blair’s 2004 downgrading of the drug because of “uncertainty” over its impact on mental health.
Okay, so presumably the advice she had been given by her scientific advisors on the matter had been unclear? Nope:
Her statement to MPs came despite the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs’ review – commissioned by Gordon Brown – saying it should stay class C.
She’s doing because she can, and because – presumably – the Daily Mail has told her to.
If you have experts in a field telling you – after a period of investigation – that cannabis should remain a class C drug, the obvious conclusion should be to ignore the people who study the field, and conclude that they were probably all high at the time. Apparently, though, these experts don’t know what they’re talking about, because:
Since cannabis was downgraded there has been widespread concern about the increased prevalence of stronger “skunk” varieties.
Presumably, because the experts the government consulted were entirely unaware of any information regarding the potency of cannabis in current circulation. I can only assume that the experts the government consulted were morons. Which – obviously – says more about the government than it does about their experts.
She added that the government’s change of heart – which is subject to parliamentary approval – was part of a “relentless drive”.
Why would you have a relentless drive against something the experts – the scientists, the medical practitioners, and those people who actually know what they’re talking about – say should remain classified as a Class C drug? Or are politicians really just terminally stupid.
For the record, I don’t smoke cannabis. I have, but I don’t anymore. I do, however, drink alcohol, and I do smoke tobacco, I love a good burger and I love cycling on the roads. Which of these will kill me quicker, I wonder?