This is ridiculous, infuriating, and just damned outrageous. I previously wrote about a civil registrar who refused to do her job, because she was a homophobic bigot, and didn’t want to do her job. She took Islington Council to an employment tribunal, claiming unfair discrimination.
Infuriatingly, she actually won.
A marriage registrar was harassed for refusing to conduct same-sex ceremonies, a tribunal has ruled.
Okay, she was harassed for attempting to break the law, which seems fine to me. She’d be harassed if she was a racist or sexist, especially if her ignorance prevented from doing her job. But in this case:
The tribunal ruled that Miss Ladele was discriminated against on grounds of religious beliefs and was harassed.
Or, in layman’s speak, “but it was okay, because she’s religious”.
This is bullshit. This is utterly incredulous bullshit.
It is illegal in the UK to refuse to provide services to a person based on their sexual orientation. Catholic adoption agencies fought hard and dirty to secure a religious opt-out. Catholic politicians fought hard to secure a religious opt-out. They failed. The law of the land is quite clear: it is not acceptable – no: it is illegal – to refuse to provide a public service to a person based upon their sexual orientation. Yet apparently, this employment tribunal thinks that there can be an exception to this law, because – erm – a person is religious.
Miss Ladele said she was being effectively forced to choose between her religion and her £31,000-a-year job as a result.
Of course she bloody was! Like it or lump it, she provides a public service. As such, it is freaking illegal for her not to provide that service irrespective of the person’s sexual orientation. If she didn’t like it she could simply find another f*cking job. This ruling makes a complete mockery of parliament (which doesn’t normally need a hand to be made a mockery of), and a complete mockery of the law.
But this pig-ignorant little bigot knows no bounds:
“It is a victory for religious liberty, not just for myself but for others in a similar position to mine.
Bullshit. This – like every other debate going on within the churches at the moment – has f*ck-all to do with “religious liberty”, and everything to do with personal bigotry.
The next time some pissant little theist tries to claim religious discrimination, and state intimidation against religion, or some ridiculous form of martyrdom because they’re being oppressed by the state machinary, I’m not going to bother to point to the bishops in the house of Lords. Nor will I bother to point to the huge number of state schools run by religious institutions, or the ridiculous amount of money the Anglican church owns, or the unprecedented restrictions on the right to protest in Australia over the pope’s – hideously mis-named – “World Youth Day”. I will simply point to this decision, which shows just how much power the religious really do have.